1/17/2024 0 Comments Optoma projector appIt's also more flexible in terms of placement, with a better zoom and a small amount of lens shift. The BenQ remains my top pick, both for its excellent image quality and the fact that it's the cheapest of the three. It's also, as of this writing, more expensive. The Epson is a solid projector, but its strengths are nearly equaled, or bettered, by the Optoma. That puts it basically head-to-head against the Epson HC2350 and BenQ HT2060, basically the two leaders in this price range. Geoffrey Morrison/CNETĪt the time of this writing, the UHD38x has been $1,100 for weeks, down from its original list of $1,400. Sitting in front of that vent gets toasty. The front right (left, as you're looking at it here), throws out a lot of heat. I'd recommend mounting it to the ceiling. The Optoma is close for color and contrast, and makes a compelling case for itself with higher resolution and some impressive brightness. It's about as textbook perfect as you'll find in the sub-$1,000 range. Which is to say, the BenQ is still the pick for purists. Both can easily fill a 100-inch screen with a bright image, and could manage 150-inch screen and still be easy to watch. The Epson's 2075 lumens isn't enough brighter than the Optoma's 1913. Where the competitive Epson excels is eye-bursting light output, and while its performance in this metric let it hold its own against the BenQ, here the Optoma is not far behind. At 348:1 its image is far more washed out, with blacks far more gray. The Epson lags way behind both the others. I measured an average contrast ratio of around 1380:1 with the BenQ, which is well above average, and around 770:1 with the Optoma which is about average for the projectors I've tested. However, the Optoma isn't significantly behind. The BenQ's contrast ratio is better, most noticeable with darker letterbox bars with 2.35:1 aspect ratio movies. The remote is brightly backlit and has direct access to a wide number of settings. It's a lot more expensive, though, and its unique gimbal design seems unnecessary for most setups. The JMGO however, is let down by a little speckle, due to the laser light source, but I don't think most people would notice or care. It's not super noticeable, but the JMGO doesn't have it. It also handles HDR better, as the Optoma has some banding in high brightness areas. I connected the BenQ, Epson, and Optoma to a Monoprice 1x4 distribution amplifier and viewed them side by side on a 102-inch 1.0-gain screen.ĭespite the similar specs, the JMGO looks better than the Optoma, with better color and a better contrast ratio. I compared the Optoma to the JMGO in the latter's review. The Epson is also 4K, while the BenQ isn't. The Epson and BenQ are roughly the same price as the Optoma, and are the traditional competition. It's here as an example of a "next-gen" design. It's powered by lasers, and boasts a similar lumen rating for more money. The JMGO N1 Ultra is a bit of an oddball, with its gimbal design. There's no lens shift, and only a small amount of zoom. Which also means this is the first DLP projector I've tested that's this bright. Perhaps just as interesting, the Optoma is the first projector I've measured that was capable of this light output that wasn't an Epson 3LCD. Last year, no projectors I reviewed hit that 200 mark, and in 2021, only one. So it seems times, as they say, are a-changin'. The Optoma UHD38x is the third projector to exceed expectations for the category just this year. For reference, an HDR-capable television is capable of 1,000 nits or more. In the many years I've been reviewing projectors, only a handful have ever put out more than 200 nits on my 102-inch, 1.0-gain screen. The smaller, more portable models certainly aren't bright, giving us a fairly reasonable scale to judge. Most mid- and high-end projectors these days are "bright," at least compared to those from just a few years ago.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |